Re: Cleaning bug list

Joel Madero píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 09:32 -0700:
> Version 2, changed orientation and tried to take comments into
> account. Let me know what you all think.

It is much better readable. I finally got a better picture :-)

Well, I think that it still need some thinking. You set "inability to
safe" as major. I think that it should be blocker. The application
would be almost useless with this bug ;-)


I suggest the following changes in the top levels:

   Q: "Does bug cause crash, loss of data[*], inability to install,
       broken core function, e.g. inability to safe any writer
       documents, print?

    + A: "yes":
        => Q: "Does it affect almost all users within everyday usage and
               is it a regression?"
                + A: "yes" => blocker, highest, MAB
                + A: "no"  => critical, high, MAB 
                  I would leave the 


    + A: "no"
        => Q: "Does bug involve a serious glitch such as tediously
               slow, inability to open particular documents, install
               some extensions, print on some printers?

                + A: "yes": => "major", high

IMHO, the rest might stay as is. Well, it would be great to create
several examples also for the other categories. I do not have power to
invent them now, though ;-)

[*] Note that data loss might be caused by incomplete import. If it is
not a regression, it might be marked by developers as an enhancement.
Note that it needs many developer/years to support some file formats.
OOXML format is described on several thousands of pages...

I am very happy with the progress and the state.

Thanks a lot for working on it.


Best Regards,
Petr