Joel Madero-2 wrote
...
If someone asked "is this reproducible in the latest release", but didn't
say anything else as to if they themselves had tried to reproduce it. I
would mark as NEEDINFO. I think that this is a bad policy as we can't
expect users to constantly come back when a new release is done and update
their bug saying "still an issue".
...
Joel
First thank you for your help on bug triaging !
About NEEDINFO, it depends on several things :
- if the bug has been reported on 3.5.0 whereas we're on 3.5.4 it can be
justified
- if the bug has been reported on 3.5.3 and you know that some work have
been done on 3.5.4 on this area, it can be useful to ask.
In both cases, it depends too if the bug is reproductible easily/quicky.
If a doc is attached and the bug is just :
- open the doc
- click on preview => fails
OK
if you have to :
- recreate a DB with tables
- queries,
- reports
- ...
it's on Mysql or Postgres so you must configure
and that the file can't be attached because data are confidential and can't
be purged, it's not the same.
In brief, I understand what you mean on this specific point but it depends
on the case.
About cleaning, I noticed 2 or 3 things (at least for crashes/freezes) which
help quite often :
- some LO specific extensions (I mean not out of the box extensions)
- a brand new LO profile (of course, they must retrieve in a backup the
custom settings) (any env)
- uninstall lo-menubar (Ubuntu, other ?)
- accessibility to disable (MacOs)
I think I already mentioned it but it seems to be still true.
So it could be useful to propose to check these points at the first step of
bug submitting (perhaps it already exists and I missed it)
For Windows bugs (crashes/freezes), I propose the "raw method" and sometimes
it worked :
- uninstall, clean registry with free tool, remove/backup LO profile,
install again.
Of course, it doesn't solve the root cause and I won't propose to quote this
on bug submitting. But when we can't reproduce the problem, I keep on
proposing it sometimes.
Anyway, really great to have some very useful help on this area :-)
Julien.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cleaning-bug-list-tp3988836p3988964.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Context
Re: Cleaning bug list · Bjoern Michaelsen
Re: Cleaning bug list · Petr Mladek
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.