On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 00:11 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
The differences look imho more technical than philosophical, even if
there are specific features in both of them.
thanks for your explanations of the LT/Lightproof differences.
Good to understand; so at least nominally everyone could work on the
same unified project without overt conflict :-) [in an ideal world].
If we could work together more closely that would be great.
Yep; the big problem is that there is real advantage in having a
capable, integrated grammar checker that we ship and works out of the
box everywhere, as now; and I really don't want to bundle other people's
binaries of OpenJDK, or worse to have to build it ourselves.
If LibreOffice dealt with all the nasties of compiling on <N>
unpleasant platforms (which I assume Java helps you with), would a
migration to C++ be conceivable (assuming python is outside the pale -
and personally I much prefer a strongly typed language myself).
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: [PATCH-3-5] fdo#35270 - kill first-use grammar checker freeze ... (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.