Re: [PATCH-3-5] fdo#35270 - kill first-use grammar checker freeze ...

Hi Daniel,


Daniel Naber-2 wrote
> > If Lightproof could use LT lexicons, that could be a temporary solution,
> > but maybe memory-consuming, as you would have a dictionary for spell
> > checking and a lexicon for grammar checking.
>
> I have never tried that but I think the finite state machine used
> internally 
> by LT is quite memory-friendly.

I had a look in the old LanguageTool written in Python.
It uses the library cPickle (renamed now pickle). I never used it. Resource
intensive, right ?

In the Java code, there is a fsa library...
Not sure there is the same thing in Python. Looking for something similar…


Daniel Naber-2 wrote
> If we could work together more closely that would be great. As you know, 
> each rule in LT has an id so it can be identified. Maybe that id could be 
> used to keep track of similar rules.

Dominique already asked for it, but I hadn’t the time to work on Grammalecte
the last months.
I’ll try to do that.


Daniel Naber-2 wrote
> Does LightProof also have integrated 
> test sentences? Then LT could use them to see what rules are missing in LT 
> and vice-versa.

No. At the moment, there is no stand-alone version of Lightproof.

Regards,
Olivier

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-3-5-fdo-35270-kill-first-use-grammar-checker-freeze-tp3983822p3985233.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.