Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I noticed this just now at the start of make.

cd packimages && unset MAKEFLAGS && \
                /Users/eagles051387/core/solenv/bin/build.pl -P4 --all -- -P4 && \
                make -j 4 -rs

Seeing as Mac 10.7.4 is running make 3.81 could i be getting bitten by the -j4 switch above?

i changed my autogen back to i386 and even after running a make clean and rerunning make i get a 
failure in soltools :(

http://pastebin.com/CYEANUip

the build error log is above.

Seems like when i try and make clean on the soltools module it gives an error below

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
        Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
  For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:
            http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development

  internal build errors:

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /Users/eagles051387/core/soltools/mkdepend

 it seems that the error is inside '', please re-run build
 inside this module to isolate the error and/or test your fix:

build_error.log should contain the captured output of the failed module(s)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To rebuild a specific module:

make .clean # optional
make 

when the problem is isolated and fixed, re-run 'make'
make[1]: *** [soltools] Error 1
make: *** [clean] Error 2

Regards

Jonathan Aquilina



On 22 May 2012, at 15:11, Christian Lohmaier wrote:

Hi David, *,

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:07 PM,  <d.ostrovsky@idaia.de> wrote:
Zitat von Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+libreoffice@googlemail.com>:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
<eagles051387@gmail.com> wrote:

I am trying to build master on my mac using clang.

only modification i made was to build for 64bit.

"only modification".... You're a funny one...

have you forgot to place a smily here ;-)

Well, yes, it is implied :-)

* Neither is building against something else than the 10.4SDK
something that has been tested

Tor did correct me on that one - so compiling against the 10.6SDK is
supposed to work, although not an option for builds released for the
general public for obvious reasons (missing compatibility with 10.4
and 10.5)

* and even less so is creating a 64bit build on Mac.
[...]
I could look at 64-bit MacOSX build, if i had mac resources ...
Or may be you (or your thinderbox) can compile for me and I would try to do
it without mac ;-)?

"you" as in me? :-)
Then the answer is "no", as I only have a PPC mac with Mac OSX 10.4 -
so neither can I try compiling for newer SDKs nor can I try with a
intel build...

I might attempt cross-compiling for Intel, but its unlikely that I
will try it with that machine, since despite beeing quite beefy (Dual
2.5Ghz G5, 2GB RAM), compared to Linux the build is dead slow. (fully
ccached the fastest ones (i.e. those with no changes in between still
take >100minutes - typical build time is more like 3 to 4 hours)

"you" as in "whoever reads this"
Might be an option - as there are tinderboxes that build from ramdisk
and can complete a build in 15 minutes...
But I don't see any benefit of a 64bit build.

ciao
Christian
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.