Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> wrote:
On 04/23/2012 10:55 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:

       So - one advantage of a VM here, is that -if- we have a 'standard'
virtual-machine for this, and do the tinderbox-ness in some snapshot or
somesuch; then in the event of problems, QA or Developers could re-use
the same VM for doing their own testing, so in some ways that might be
more generally useful.


Another general advantage of doing tinderbox builds in a VM would be that
each build can start from a known-good VM snapshot and a runaway build can
be stopped cleanly.  So problems like steadily filling up tmp or leftover
processes after a hung test would become non-issues.  (Not that they do
plague us, though; just for the record.)

Not really. VM or not the tinderbox operate continuously... we do not
re-ipl the VM after each build (good thing otherwise we would have to
pull the git tree from the time the VM was created, which would take
longer and longer)

My main motivation to consider VMs in that case was simply 1 physical
Box, 3 BSD flavors :-)

Norbert

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.