Re: Automatic using ::rtl::OUString etc.

On 04/13/2012 07:42 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>   Strings already kind of are a magic special case. They are the one
> non-builtin type that is by far the most used one, close to the builtin ones
> (which is part of the reason why many programming languages do have strings
> as a builtin type). So I see nothing wrong with trying to get them as
> conveniently usable as possible, as ::any::little::annoynance::there
> AddsUpNumerousTimesL BECAUSE_THE_THING_IS_USED_SO_OFTEN.

I am not objecting to the goal of frequently used entities having 
reasonably short names.  I am objecting to the hacky implementation.

(And, at least in my book, the rtl:: prefix is already reasonably short. 
 What sucks is the "O" in "OUString"...)

Stephan