On 11/04/12 19:52, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
But if you have anything more specific about com/sun/star/lang I could probably have a
look there.
Well, starting with XComponent.idl, I don't see any high-level
description what a "component" *is* ;)
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/ProUNO/The_XComponent_Interface
Or am I expecting too much from the documentation in the IDL files
(and generated from that), is it so that the reader is expected to
have grokked some other, more prose style (not doc-comment -style)
documentation first before reading the IDL comments?
generally the DevGuide has the high-level documentation; the odk build
also inserts various references to the DevGuide into the generated HTML
documentation (which is one reason why autodoc is still required), for
example take a look at:
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/lang/XComponent.html
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.