Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 04/02/2012 05:49 PM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
2012/4/2 Stephan Bergmann<sbergman@redhat.com>:
And once these better tests offer coverage comparable to the old ones, we can
finally ditch them.

I would prefer an incremental process here, but that is just my
opinion. I think it makes sense every time a interface is covered by a
c++ based test that we disable the old java test and only use the new
test.

I'm actually fine any way we do that. My only concern is that we do not retire old tests without having adequate coverage through new ones in place.

Stephan

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.