Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit

Noel Grandin <noel -AT- peralex.com>
Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:49:08 +0200



On 2012-04-02 13:43, Michael Stahl wrote:

sure, as long as you're not just blindly translating the stupidqadevOOo test to C++;

Ah, but that's why it's an __EasyHack__ :-)

But yes, I agree, building upon such a change to improve the testinfrastructure is a better idea.


Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html

Context

proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Noel Grandin
- Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Michael Meeks
- Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Michael Stahl
  - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Noel Grandin
    - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Michael Stahl
      - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Noel Grandin
    - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Stephan Bergmann
      - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Markus Mohrhard
        
        Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Stephan Bergmann

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.