Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>
Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:38:07 +0200

On 04/02/2012 01:29 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:

So moving them to CppUnit would at least be a step in the right direction?

I don't think simply rewriting them from Java to C++ in their currentform is worth it. It would be better to replace them with better tests.And once these better tests offer coverage comparable to the old ones,we can finally ditch them.


Stephan

Context

proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Noel Grandin
- Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Michael Meeks
- Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Michael Stahl
  - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Noel Grandin
    - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Michael Stahl
      - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Noel Grandin
    - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Stephan Bergmann
      - Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Markus Mohrhard
        
        Re: proposed easyhack: converting c++ unit tests from JUnit to CppUnit · Stephan Bergmann

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.