Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Rainer, all


It's my belief that we will have to rethink our release concept.


It is true that this model tends to accumulate regressions. Unfortunately
it is not easy to measure if adding more features is attracting more users
than repelling users because of regressions/unsolved problems...
On a positive note see how far this has taken us since release 3.3.0 ;)

Please excuse me that I can't tell anything more enthusiastic.


TBH I am quite enthusiastic that the long standing regression Bug #36982
(which caused data loss and was reported 10 months ago) was finally
squashed.

But I do agree that killing branches (without solving all regressions)
means that users are being left behind as the project moves forward...
Maybe branch 3.4.x should continue to be updated (in the same way that
Mozilla keeps fixing bugs in version 3.6.x, with x currently at 28, even
though the latest version is 11.0...) until at least all 3.3.x regressions
are fixed???

Regards,
Pedro

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.