Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Pedro,

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 05:32:04PM +0000, Pedro Lino wrote:
Maybe branch 3.4.x should continue to be updated (in the same way that
Mozilla keeps fixing bugs in version 3.6.x, with x currently at 28, even
though the latest version is 11.0...) until at least all 3.3.x regressions
are fixed???

No, as a) that is a _lot_ of work b) Mozilla is not comparable as those fixes
are security fixes, while Rainer was talking about feature regressions, which
is a completely different beast.

Given the state of the 3.5 series we can expect at least 3.5.2/3.5.3 to be
already a lot more stable than 3.4.4/3.4.5 were -- this dimishes developer
motivation to backport fixes to 3.4. And as Rainers post confirms, it is the
same in QA. I dont see this as a Bad Thing actually: 3.5 is so good and so much
better, that it is a Good Thing if it is the focus of our efforts now.

Best,

Bjoern

P.S.: If the 3.5 series was a weak release and 3.4 was an exceptionally strong
one, my opinion might have been different. But lets not talk about imaginative
scenarios: 3.5 is a very strong release series!

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.