Hey,
the attached patch together with [1] fixes the remaining problems when
you try to edit the chart in the document attached to fdo#44832. [1]
was an obvious fix while the attached patch is not obvious and I'm not
sure that it will not introduce another regression. I don't fully
understand why we need to add special handling for labels of second
and following categories.
Maybe someone here has an idea about the code, otherwise I would push
it to master and wait for people to test it carefully in 3-6.
Regards,
Markus
[1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a769fd1ec076b61c1ce2f84da87283cc637dd5d5
From 1cda150c6d798f8ba30cd3db58d3faa089f905eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:45:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] don't add special handling for second and following
categories, fdo#44832
---
chart2/source/view/axes/VCartesianAxis.cxx | 36 +++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/chart2/source/view/axes/VCartesianAxis.cxx b/chart2/source/view/axes/VCartesianAxis.cxx
index a6547ef..8291efb 100644
--- a/chart2/source/view/axes/VCartesianAxis.cxx
+++ b/chart2/source/view/axes/VCartesianAxis.cxx
@@ -1333,20 +1333,15 @@ void VCartesianAxis::doStaggeringOfLabels( const AxisLabelProperties&
rAxisLabel
for( sal_Int32 nTextLevel=0; nTextLevel<nTextLevelCount; nTextLevel++ )
{
SAL_WNODEPRECATED_DECLARATIONS_PUSH
- ::std::auto_ptr< TickIter > apTickIter = createLabelTickIterator( nTextLevel );
+ ::std::auto_ptr< TickIter > apTickIter = createLabelTickIterator( nTextLevel );
SAL_WNODEPRECATED_DECLARATIONS_POP
- if(apTickIter.get())
- {
- double fRotationAngleDegree = m_aAxisLabelProperties.fRotationAngleDegree;
- if( nTextLevel>0 )
+ if(apTickIter.get())
{
- lcl_shiftLables( *apTickIter.get(), aCummulatedLabelsDistance );
- fRotationAngleDegree = 0.0;
+ double fRotationAngleDegree = m_aAxisLabelProperties.fRotationAngleDegree;
+ aCummulatedLabelsDistance += lcl_getLabelsDistance( *apTickIter.get()
+ , pTickFactory2D->getDistanceAxisTickToText( m_aAxisProperties )
+ , fRotationAngleDegree );
}
- aCummulatedLabelsDistance += lcl_getLabelsDistance( *apTickIter.get()
- , pTickFactory2D->getDistanceAxisTickToText( m_aAxisProperties )
- , fRotationAngleDegree );
- }
}
}
else if( rAxisLabelProperties.getIsStaggered() )
@@ -1408,18 +1403,9 @@ void VCartesianAxis::createLabels()
AxisLabelProperties aComplexProps(m_aAxisLabelProperties);
if( m_aAxisProperties.m_bComplexCategories )
{
- if( nTextLevel==0 )
- {
- aComplexProps.bLineBreakAllowed = true;
- aComplexProps.bOverlapAllowed = !::rtl::math::approxEqual(
aComplexProps.fRotationAngleDegree, 0.0 );
- }
- else
- {
- aComplexProps.bOverlapAllowed = true;
- aComplexProps.bRhythmIsFix = true;
- aComplexProps.nRhythm = 1;
- aComplexProps.fRotationAngleDegree = 0.0;
- }
+ aComplexProps.bLineBreakAllowed = true;
+ aComplexProps.bOverlapAllowed = !::rtl::math::approxEqual(
aComplexProps.fRotationAngleDegree, 0.0 );
+
}
AxisLabelProperties& rAxisLabelProperties =
m_aAxisProperties.m_bComplexCategories ? aComplexProps : m_aAxisLabelProperties;
while( !createTextShapes( m_xTextTarget, *apTickIter.get(), rAxisLabelProperties,
pTickFactory2D, nScreenDistanceBetweenTicks ) )
@@ -1515,8 +1501,6 @@ void VCartesianAxis::updatePositions()
,static_cast<sal_Int32>(aTickScreenPos2D.getY()));
double fRotationAngleDegree = m_aAxisLabelProperties.fRotationAngleDegree;
- if( nDepth>0 )
- fRotationAngleDegree = 0.0;
// #i78696# use mathematically correct rotation now
const double fRotationAnglePi(fRotationAngleDegree * (F_PI / -180.0));
@@ -1615,8 +1599,6 @@ void VCartesianAxis::createShapes()
if( apTickIter.get() )
{
double fRotationAngleDegree = m_aAxisLabelProperties.fRotationAngleDegree;
- if( nTextLevel>0 )
- fRotationAngleDegree = 0.0;
B2DVector aLabelsDistance( lcl_getLabelsDistance( *apTickIter.get(),
pTickFactory2D->getDistanceAxisTickToText( m_aAxisProperties, false ), fRotationAngleDegree ) );
sal_Int32 nCurrentLength = static_cast<sal_Int32>(aLabelsDistance.getLength());
aTickmarkPropertiesList.push_back(
m_aAxisProperties.makeTickmarkPropertiesForComplexCategories( nOffset + nCurrentLength, 0,
nTextLevel ) );
--
1.7.7
Context
- [PATCH] fix for fdp#44832, correctly display axis labels for complex categories · Markus Mohrhard
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.