Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi> wrote:
Does anybody who knows the code feel like reviewing the patch for
real,
I could review, but then I'm not knowledgeable enough on the chart2
code to add any confidence.
or should we just trust Markus that it fixes the problem, and
push it? (I think we should.)
I'm not so sure, since even Markus says in his post he doesn't really
understand the code that he's modified, and I'm not either.
Isn't there some odd indentation changes in the patch?
The same pattern is used in the first part of the if statement, and
his patch only modifies the second part. Is that a legitimate change,
or should the first part be modified also? I don't know the chart2
code well enough to answer that question. Also, what would be the
risk of this change; what functionalities of the chart be affected by
this change?
My honest recommendation is to keep this change in master only for the
time being, and consider backporting when we feel more confident of
this change. I've been burned in the past by the very changes I made
in chart2 which I though were safe but ended up causing
regressions....
Sorry about not giving my thumbs-up.
Kohei
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.