Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Cor,

On 2012-02-20 at 17:44 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:

    Anyhow - I don't see a special case for bending the rules of triple
reviews, nor a reason to refuse it if it gets that widespread
support :-) it's a nice fix.

Thanks, that sounds encouraging.
As written: going for 3.5.2 means two reviews needed?!

Nope, still 3 I am afraid :-( - after the feature freeze, before we even
needed 1 review for pushing to the libreoffice-3-5 branch, it was 3
reviews for a feature or two that got in few days after the feature
freeze (I remember the SmartArt import).

Otherwise, as I already wrote you on the IRC - I for sure won't veto it
if we get the reviews :-) - unfortunately I cannot review myself in the
following few days.

Regards,
Kendy


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.