On Wednesday 08 of February 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 08/02/12 18:10, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Is there any fundamental problem in just shoving all the objects in
framework into one library (for instance the "fwk" one, or one renamed
to the perhaps more logical name "framework")?
Not perhaps, certainly :).
AFAIK this module caused huge problems when gbuild-ifying on Windows
(specifically because of the weird DLLPUBLIC things going on there), so
in any case please test if it works on Windows before pushing such a
change.
My guess is that the framework code might originally have gone into
just one shared library, anybody know the reason why it was split up
into five separate ones?
hmm... no idea, perhaps mba remembers the rationale?
oh, one thing: probably some libs are required at startup and others
not; so merging all in one brings a startup performance penalty (but
even then 2 libs should be enough?)
I don't think there would be a noticeable penalty if the libraries were
merged into one. They all link the same libraries according to ldd (except
for some intra-dependencies), and they all together are less than 5M, so
probably reading it all in one go may be in fact more efficient. But I cannot
find something that would actually link libfwk [*], which is 3M, so at least
merging the other 4 definitely makes sense even from performance point of
view.
I can't comment on other reasons why this might have been split though.
[*] Seriously, I can't find a thing. Is there actually something using the
library?
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lunak@suse.cz
Context
- Re: OK to merge the fw? libraries in framework? (continued)
Re: OK to merge the fw? libraries in framework? · Mathias Bauer
Re: OK to merge the fw? libraries in framework? · Lubos Lunak
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.