Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


While trying to find easy ways to lower the number of (shared)
libraries, which is more or less on the critical path for the Android
work (the stupid run-time linker on Android has a low (from our
perverse perspective) limit on the number of shared libraries that can
be used at a time in a process), I started looking at the libraries
built in the "framework" module (mnemonically and self-documentingly
named fwe, fwi, fwk, fwl and fwm).

Is there any fundamental problem in just shoving all the objects in
framework into one library (for instance the "fwk" one, or one renamed
to the perhaps more logical name "framework")?

My guess is that the framework code might originally have gone into
just one shared library, anybody know the reason why it was split up
into five separate ones?

(Obviously the corresponding component files will have to be merged,
too, and references to the libraries changed to reference fwk (only)
instead in various places.)

--tml

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.