Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 11:21 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 01/26/2012 10:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
humm... we don't need stlport these day... we only build it for
external extensions that may still need it...

        I forget when that happened, but you're really best off with the 3.5
builds where stlport is certainly optional.

but surely for OpenSolaris existing base of extension is probably
not a critical issue....

...and any existing C++ extensions for Solaris would not work, anyway, 
as they are compiled against the Sun Studio ABI, not the GCC one.

        Of course :-) but I've never seen a binary Solaris extension in the
wild, so ... stlport is one to happily ignore.

        HTH,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.