Hi Christian,
Christian Lohmaier wrote (09-01-12 02:10)
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Cor Nouws<oolst@nouenoff.nl> wrote:
So time to prepare bug hunt session two.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5
and
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5#2nd_Bug-hunting_session
Or is there something that should make us change our mind for that?
No, not really, It should be on Saturday/Sunday this time, as a few
people complained that they cannot attend such an event during the
week.
Fine for me.
But a disclaimer from my part: I won't be able to attend on Jan 21, as
I'm invited on a birthday.
I have other responsibilities too on the 21st. No probs, people enough :-)
As may be read from the other thread (thread 'Evaluating first 3.5.0
Bug-Hunt Session' on the QA list) I'm far from sure about the impact on
level of issues,
Yeah, impact on 3.5issues is not that big, but I think it just needs
time for people to get used to.
but looking at the overall activity/awareness, I think it's
worth.
Exactly what I am thinking :-)
We could send a mail to the people that submitted their fist bug during the
session, asking their feedback for possible improvement. Would that be OK,
do you think?
Sure, but then the Jan 20/21st might be too close.
If it helps, it does, if not it doesn't..
Other hits/remarks of course appreciated as well :-)
Find mentors "officially" and don't rely on people to show up for the
second one. It did work out on the first session, but esp. for the
follow-up event it should be sure that mentors are around.
I agree with that.
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.