Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

Bjoern Michaelsen píše v St 21. 12. 2011 v 21:31 +0100:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:34:26PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Note that I used the correct version 3.4.99.1 for this beta. We use
> > (3.3.99.X also for 3.4 betas). I am sorry that I used 3.5.0.0 for
> > beta0. The 3.5.0.x version are reserved for release candidates.
>
> Can we tag the beta0 as 3.4.99.0 in addition to 3.5.0.0 for now? That shouldnt
> hurt.
>
> If someone asks about the 3.5.0.0 tag, we could tell them to just ignore it
> without lengthy discussions.
>
> Well, people could still ask why our rcs start at 1, while our minors and
> majors start at 0 and we _could_ answer that with "tradition" as OOo did so
> too. That would not be the whole story as 3.X.X_m0 was the branchoff point at
> OOo (quite a sensible convention), in which case our 3.5.0.0 is slightly of the
> mark.

IMHO, the right explanation is that .0.1 is the first release candidate
for the the initial release and .1.1 is the first release candidate for
the first bug fix release.

> Anyway: Could we at least please double-tag 3.5.0.0 as 3.4.99.0?

done

I am sorry for the troubles.


Best Regards.
Petr