Re: [Libreoffice] Cups.h Missing

So is this not a bug then? It seems to me that going back to a space seems
much more functional as the default makes it so that the look of the
bullets/outline is very sloppy. If it is a bug, I'm still interested in
tracking down the code responsible and altering it. This will be my first
attempt to contribute to LO and it's been an ongoing annoyance for me as I
outline a lot. Thanks for the input from both of you

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Regina Henschel
<rb.henschel@t-online.de>wrote:

> Hi Joel,
>
> Joel Madero schrieb:
>
>  I've never used dnl check before, can you give me a quick tutorial or link
> > me somewhere?
> >
> > Bug I'm trying to fix is this:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/**ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+**bug/831305<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/831305>
> >
> > You can see my section under jmadero, that's what I'm trying to pintpoint.
> >
> > I'm installing version 2.1.0 from OOo to see if the bug still exists, if
> > it
> > doesn't I'll start comparing code to see if I can find out why it
> > currently
> > exists, part of compiling from source is just to get the experience, also
> > this way if I make a patch or an alteration I should be able to recompile
> > relatively easily.
>
> The problem comes up, because the default setting has changed from
> inserting space between number and text to inserting a tab. The changes in
> numbering where made from OOo2.4 to OOo3 together with the change from
> ODF1.0/1.1 to ODF 1.2. A hint to some of the changes are in [1] and [2].
>
> Currently the tap stop position of the anonymous predefined styles are the
> same for all kind of numberings. Perhaps it is possible to use different
> positions or even kind of separators for the different predefined anonymous
> styles. For the named styles an improvement is not quite so urgent because
> those users who work with named styles are likely able to change the
> settings by themselves.
>
> The problem is connected to the claim, that the indent don't work for
> numbers with more than one digit for example in numbering kind (#).
>
> [1] 
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=89178<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=89178>
> [2] 
> http://specs.openoffice.org/**writer/numbering/**NewListLevelAttrs.odt<http://specs.openoffice.org/writer/numbering/NewListLevelAttrs.odt>
>
> Kind regards
> Regina