On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 11:30 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi> wrote:
Flames about C99 being over ten years old already to /dev/null,
please. Voluntary technical standards that significant industry
participants choose to mostly ignore are mostly worthless.
'significant industry "particiapnt"' that chose to ignore standard are
going to be stepped around... hence the mingw effort
So, I have some concern with the direction we are going with this.
Assuming that we will try to ditch MSVC in favor of mingw on Windows,
will we require people hacking on Windows to use mingw exclusively?
Also, does mingw do platform specific optimization as well as MSVC does?
Whatabout debugging tools? How will one debug LibreOffice on Windows?
I assume using Visual Studio as a debugging tool is out the window (no
pun intended)?
Telling them to switch to Linux is not an option though. Not everybody
can make the switch, and some (many?) Windows developers want to stay on
Windows as the primary development platform.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
Context
Re: [Libreoffice] oox/source/drawingml/customshapepresets.cxx is just too much for gcc · Bjoern Michaelsen
Re: [Libreoffice] oox/source/drawingml/customshapepresets.cxx is just too much for gcc (rant inside) · Bjoern Michaelsen
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.