Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 10/05/2011 10:11 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 05.10.2011 22:02, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
Dnia 2011-10-05, śro o godzinie 17:35 +0200, Lubos Lunak pisze:
On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Jan Holesovsky wrote:

That would allow you to convert the pO->GetData() to something like
po->data(), instead of&(*pO)[0] (and similar) used on many places...

  That same would be allowed by
class bytes : public std::vector<sal_uInt8>
{
public:
const sal_uInt8* data() const { return&front(); }
...
So if it is desired solution I can modify Patches?

why not just use "&po->front()" directly instead, that's nicer than
&(*po)[0] and no need to introduce a class just for this IMHO.

&v[0] has become something of a standard idiom, I'd say. So, personal taste mostly.

Btw, &v[0] (as well as &v.front()) are only valid if !v.empty() -- but (without checking it in detail right now) I guess the patch already takes account of that, Maciej?

-Stephan

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.