Re: [Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble

On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 12:27 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:

> (*) Caolán's patch fixes also
>     ODatabaseMetaDataResultSet::getTimestamp.  (Hunh?  
>     Why does the diff say that the changed line is in
>     ODatabaseMetaDataResultSet::getShort?
...
>  I still think the changed function is getTimestamp.)

This is just an artefact of "patch" itself, the text on the line after
@@ can be somewhat irrelevant to what actually get patched.

I pushed my patch, mostly because its the simplest, and Lionel can
double-check it later at his leisure.

> (*) Both patches discard milliseconds.  I *guess* this is
>     the right thing to do, but would welcome others'
>     opinions.  Anyway, there is no more need for the TODO
>     comment saying to ask this question.

We're kind of stuck there without a lot of work because 100ths of a
second is as good as our existing timestamps support. Probably ok given
given http://support.microsoft.com/kb/263872

C.