Silly me! While reading some of the LibreOffice code for
ODBC connections, I started to look at ...
ISO/IEC FCD 9075-3:2006(E)
Title: Information technology - Database Languages - SQL
- Part 3: Call-Level Interface (SQL/CLI)
<http://jtc1sc32.org/doc/N1501-1550/32N1527T-text%20for%20FCD%209075-3.pdf>
This passage in section "4.4.1 Handles" catches my eye:
The validity of a handle in a compilation unit other
than the one in which the identified resource was
allocated is implementation-defined.
Yikes! How can any large (or moderate sized) project avoid
assuming the validity of ODBC handles across the boundaries
of compilation units? LibreOffice seems to assume continued
validity; for example
connectivity/source/drivers/odbcbase/OConnection.cxx line
640 allocates a statement handle which
connectivity/source/drivers/odbcbase/OStatement.cxx line 94
copies for use later.
So, I wonder ...
(*) Is there a better reference document for me to look at?
(*) What ODBC driver invalidates an ODBC handle across
compilation unit boundaries?
(*) By what magic can the driver know anything about its
caller's compilation units, anyway?
Will some kind soul here please tell me that I need not
worry about such things?
Thanks,
Terry.
Context
- [Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble · Terrence Enger
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.