Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 05:10 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
More generally: either the accessor is not useful and both set and
get can go, or it is and the fact that one side is not used is more a
signe that someone is not using it when it should or not using it
_yet_

If you feel strongly about it,

No I don't feel strongly about it... It is just that I got caught by
it, working on a cws,
and on top of that it happen to be a non-trivial accessor... but then
again, that is what git is for.
I search the log for unusedcode.easy related patch that touched that
particular source... and found the needed diff :-)

Norbert

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.