On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:33:03 +0200
Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
wrote:
I think its *file based* dependencies that's the problem here -- they
are simply not at the right level of granularity. (Then again, I'm
not sure there's at all a working theory of making arbitrary changes
to your source tree and then rebuilding everything that needs to be
rebuilt while only rebuilding as little as possible what would not
necessarily need to be rebuilt.)
No need for such theory, as for all practical proposes, there is ccache
doing exactly that (although with a bit of addition IO). As for finer
granularity: With the practical reality of C/C++ with preprocessing,
context sensitive syntax and commandline switches to influence the
compile result there is little hope for such a thing existing _and_ be
reasonably fast (read: orders of magnitude faster than just frigging
compiling it).
Best,
Bjoern
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.