On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 04:28 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Well, Peter asked the question on the list before starting to work on
it and and the consensus was that for these limited cases the benefit
outweighed the cost.
Indeed - the outcome of the:
'use of apache ant in libreoffice'
thread from Wed, seemed (to me) to be that there is an advantage to
being able to properly parallelize and gnumake-ify the java compiles,
and if there are (increasingly) few java pieces and we can drop ant in
some star-trek future as a build dep, that is surely no bad thing.
Clearly there is then no prohibition on using ant, or external / java
packages that require it - but Peter's patches seem to convert two of
the five modules using ant to (cleaner) gnu make files in the process
and leave only: beanshell scripting and xmerge requiring ant.
Seems like progress to me, I'd love to see that included.
I'm going to work on converting the other ant modules soon.
I'll commit these 2 patches after I finish testing them a bit more.
Peter
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.