Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] convert MathMLDTD to gbuild and add to tail_build

On 09/13/2011 11:18 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 13.09.2011 11:09, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > On 09/13/2011 01:00 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Michael Stahl<mst@openoffice.org>   wrote:
> > > > On 12.09.2011 23:26, Peter Foley wrote:
> > > > > --- a/MathMLDTD/prj/build.lst
> > > > > +++ b/MathMLDTD/prj/build.lst
> > > > > @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
> > > > > -md   MathMLDTD       :       solenv NULL
> > > > > -md   MathMLDTD                                                       usr1    -       all     
> > > > > md_mkout NULL
> > > > > -md   MathMLDTD\prj                                           get             -       all     
> > > > > md_prj NULL
> > > > > +md   MathMLDTD       : NULL
> > > >
> > > > you remove the dependency on solenv; it seems that currently we don't
> > > > have any module (except solenv of course, and "testautomation" which
> > > > doesn't do anything) that does not directly or indirectly depend on
> > > > solenv; i wonder why that is?  is there perhaps some reason that modules
> > > > must depend on solenv?
> > >
> > > isn't that for the basic setup of solver ? (mkdir od bin inc etc..)
> > > but I believe Deliver.mk do the mkdir by precaution anyways.. so that
> > > should no have any impact here..
> >
> > But that might explain the strange tinderbox failure at
> > <b>,
> > a missing 350minor.mk early one, where xml2cmp is one of the first three
> > modules being built (in parallel).
> >
> > -Stephan
>
> thanks for reminding me, 3X0minor.mk was the thing that i only vaguely
> remembered.  apparently it's still necessary in converted modules
> because we start gmake indirectly via dmake.
>
> guess somebody should put back the solenv deps :)

doing it right now

-Stephan