Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 07.09.2011 22:40, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
ok, fits in better with the other RepositoryFoo.mk stuff.
but why not just RepositoryModule.mk?

Some hope/anticipation that there may be more than one product sharing
the same spaces ?  not sure...

I have never fully understood why we have these Repository*.mk files
in the top directory at all. Why can't this stuff, for us in
LibreOffice, be in solenv/gbuild?

there's a reason why they are called Repository*.mk: the idea was that
every HG repository would have these at the root, and you could then
combine all of them (via the gb_REPOS variable) into a single make process.

in Hamburg we had the "ooo", "sun" (non-free) and (since DEV300m101)
"l10n" HG repositories.

but apparently LO has never made use of this mechanism; instead ugly
symlinks are created to link the modules that are not in "core" into the
top-level directory.
ok, guess this has the advantage that you probably don't need to use the
horrible source_config contraption... as i suggested a different mailing
list today, build.pl should just respect ${gb_REPOS}, then source_config
is unnecessary.

regards,
 michael


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.