Hi Lior!
Thanks for your lightning fast reply ...
Am Montag, den 05.09.2011, 19:51 +0300 schrieb Lior Kaplan:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Christoph Noack
<christoph@dogmatux.com> wrote:
> Looks reasonable to me. Pushed now to master.
[...]
@ Lior: Do you think the proposal by Liz might fit better (and
does meet
l10n requirements in terms of length)? Otherwise, I'm fine
(and thankful
for your tweak).
I tried to keep the string as short as possible. Your/Liz's suggestion
sounds OK, but I think it's a bit long (trying to visualize it on the
dialog).
Anyone has another opinions on this ?
Oh, let's simply keep the new string if it fits from you point-of-view.
My main aim was to hint towards existing information that might have
been helpful here.
Concerning the latter, it would be great if you could CC the mailing
list libreoffice-ux-advice if (hard to discuss) string proposals pop up.
Maybe we/I can provide hints to discussion from OOo UX times.
Since I have another question, I'd like to move that discussions to that
mailing list (no subscription required) and like to ask you, whether a
terminology database / glossary is available for UI stuff. Is this
something the l10n team is working on? Terminology is terribly important
and it would be immensely helpful for UX / UI stuff to have a shared
resource for Documentation / Translation / Design.
Cheers,
Christoph
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.