Hi Markus, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 15:24:31 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
- if ( (!pOUTextContent && !pOUText && !pOUTextValue) - && ( (pOUTextContent && !pOUTextContent->getLength()) || !pOUTextContent ) - && ( (pOUText && !pOUText->getLength()) || !pOUText ) - && ( (pOUTextValue && !pOUTextValue->getLength()) || !pOUTextValue )) + if (!pOUTextContent && !pOUText && !pOUTextValue)
Might it be that the original intention was if ( (!pOUTextContent && !pOUText && !pOUTextValue) || ( (pOUTextContent && !pOUTextContent->getLength()) || !pOUTextContent ) || ( (pOUText && !pOUText->getLength()) || !pOUText ) || ( (pOUTextValue && !pOUTextValue->getLength()) || !pOUTextValue )) instead? Just from looking at it, without having seen the context around.. Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature