Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele Barabucci<gioele@svario.it>  wrote:
I was wondering why the git tags are named `3.3.4.2` for 3.3.4-rc2
instead of the more natural `3.3.4-rc2` or the more common `v3.3.4-rc2`.
I am used to see 3.3.4.2 as the second bugfix release for 3.3.4, or, in
more mathematical terms, 3.3.4.2>  3.3.4 = 3.3.4.0. I hope 3.5-rc1 will
not be tagged as 3.5.1.

Is this behaviour a leftover of the SVN workflow? Could it be changed?

The problem is that when 3.4.x.y is tagged in git, nobody knows if it
will be the last RC or not. The final 3.4.x release is always the same
as the last RC, and there is only one 3.4.x.y tag for them.

Sorry, but I do not understand. What I'd do to release `3.4.1-rc2` is

1. tag current commit with `v3.4.1-rc2`,
2. ask for review,
3. if no problem is found, tag same commit with `v3.4.1`.

In case changes are needed:

3b. make change and tag the current commit with `v3.4.1-rc2`,
4. ask for another review,
4. tag same commit with `v3.4.1`.

Also in this case you have only one `3.4.X-rcY` tag for each `3.4.X`.

There must be something that I miss...

--
Gioele Barabucci <gioele@svario.it>


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.