Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Dne 18.8.2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna napsal(a):

An alternative would be what KDE does (or something similar, Lubos may
know better): when the RC is supposed to be the last one, then tag it as
3.4.x, then release the tarballs in a private packager list, repack
tarballs without incrementing version number when critical issues found,
then release to the public.

Please don't.
We always really loved how the tarballs change under our hands
when working on KDE releases.

The time period in KDE is required because the tarballs often
won't build due to different layout in svn/git compared to them.
So the repacking happen more due to build fixes than to bug fixes
that are done with libreoffice.

I bit know what I am saying as I was KDE Team lead on Gentoo for
one year.

Cheers

Tom

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.