Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Fwd: [PATCH] Bug 39167

Gerald Leppert <gleppert -AT- gmx.de>
Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:04:10 +0200

Hi Friedrich, hi all,

does anyone here have a less rigid opinion on that matter than the oneexpressed by Friedrich? I really don't care whether you want LibreOfficeto be a developers AND users community or whether you want to separatethese two from each other; whether the LibreOffice community iswelcoming or not.

I only would like to know how users are allowed / should / cancontribute to the EasyHacks-system. I am confused, because the originalEasyHacks wiki page did not carry any restriction on who may contributeto it and my interactions with others on that matter had been alwayspositive. Also, the definition of the tag [ProposedEasyHack] is definedas "As task that is thought to be easy to hack, but has not been checkedby a developer to not contain nasty surprises". Please advise.


Best greetings,
Gerald

Context

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Fwd: [PATCH] Bug 39167 (continued)

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.