Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@novell.com> wrote:
Hi Joe,

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 20:21 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote:
Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings:

       Wow - what a nice write-up; we have similar problems on Linux deciding
what versions of what underlying infrastructure to support and/or when
to axe it.

       It sounds like 3.5 is a good place to make a platform cut for some of
this stuff to make our lives easier.

       I'd love an ack from Norbert / Christian - to make a final decision, or
if it is truly controversial we can discuss it at the TSC meeting next
week.


http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?spider=1&qprid=10
show that the ratio of Mac OS 10.4 vs Mac OS in general is about 6%
down from 12.5% a year ago.

With 3.4 keeping support for 10.4, and at the current rate of
attrition of the 10.4 installed based, I think that the 3.4 life-cycle
will be enough to cater for that demographic

so:

Ack for bumping minimum requirement to 10.5


Caveat: Like tml_ I don't consider myself a 'Mac' developer... just a
Dev that happen to own a Mac.

That being said, Christian is the person that need convincing.

Norbert

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.