On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:57 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Just to tone down this statistics a bit. The vast majority of changes
are in fact code relocations with no changes
So - I've pushed it to -3-4-2 - after doing my best at reviewing the
changes; but I'm really unhappy with this.
I would like to understand:
* why mdds is maintained in a separate place - can we not
whack it into the calc/ git module ?
* why it is not branched and frozen with the same cadence - so
we have small fixes back-ported, rather than having to review
large code movements / renaming / etc.
+ I'm well up for API cleaning and big beautification
patches etc. but prefer them on the unstable branch.
Also - some UI pointers for QA to do some more hard-core testing of its
various uses cases here would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.