Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Caolán, all,

Concerning your open question, the proposed patch checks if the searched
string belongs to the selection by using the same mechanism as the common
search command. Therefore it should have the same behaviour as the search
command in both cases (common or advanced search/replace).

Best Regards,

--
Benoit

2011/7/2 Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>

On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 01:08 +0200, Benoit Dolives wrote:
Hi,


Please find in attachment the patch for the bug 36181.

initially looks good, unless someone else has a look before Monday I'll
take this one for review then. Only open question I have, without
reading the bug report or building sw with the patch, is if it
does-the-right-thing if the search/replace is one of the regular
expression "advanced" search/replaces ?

C.





-- 
Benoit Dolives

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.