On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Tor Lillqvist <tlillqvist@novell.com> wrote:
so the _s create a false sens of security...
On the other hand, I guess shouldn't be that bad to use the "secure
functions" on the Windows specific bits of code.
If I remember well, Mingw32 ships the safelib too, so it wouldn't be a
problem for crosscompilation.
Any advantages of doing that? Well, we could issue a nice PR saying
that the Windows code is now more "secure" :P
--
Jesús Corrius <jesus@softcatala.org>
Document Foundation founding member
Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26
Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] Making our Own Banned.h (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.