Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi All

2011/6/17 Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@novell.com>

Hi Cor,

On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 20:00 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Wrt. the upgrade paths we recommend - we can work that out later of
course

Not so sure if that is a wise approach.

        Hey :-) so - first off, the plan is to only shipping the capability
of
notifying for an update without immediately lighting up the update
recommendation server. Also - since we are shipping it only in one
version 3.4.1 - there is nothing to update to anyway ( unless you count
3.3.3 ;-). So the net effect will be (I think) nothing. We have a week+
to shake out any bugs in it.

This feature often brought no joy. Wrong information, not available
url's etc. I guess there is some work needed to make it work properly.
Either in the code, or on the server side...

        Sure - so, as I understand it, the server is notified of the client
version, so we can build whatever matrix we like of recommended upgrades
(or none at all), based on the version they are using. That seems
flexible enough for what we want - and of course, we can decide that
matrix with some considerable thought later.

Indeed, above the already mentioned problem, we have the challenge
to make sure that the right user does find the right version for
her situation.

        Of course - and we also have the existing challenge that people are
not
updated, and are running old LibreOffice's with plenty of known bugs
fixed in them. ie. if we care about quality we want people to update
through release series .0 -> .1 -> .2 etc. Clearly sysadmins need to be
able to turn this off, as no doubt we'll do for the SUSE, RedHat, Ubuntu
etc. versions - but that is not a huge issue.

       So - is there still a problem ?


Yes I think, but it can be solved by a twist on some bits:

LO 3.4.x is in a different path than LO3.3.x . Shall  LO3.5.x be in a
different path than LO3.4.x?

In user space, this means as if a new product landed, with noise on icons
associations, double entries of LO in Start Menu, bla bla bla.

In enterprise space, a bunch of disgruntled sysadmins to wipe old version.
This old update scheme may cause a bunch of headaches. (sysadmin dream:
update LO as easy as update FireFox)

 Kind regards
-- 
Olivier Hallot
Founder and Steering Commitee Member
The Document Foundation

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.