Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Bjoern,

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 13:44 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Which is just plain wrong and needs immediate fixing. Keeping master
buildable must be as high in priority as doing that with the release
branch.

        I suggest we cool off and discuss this, in a more measured way, in the
TSC meeting on Thursday, deferring until then.

        It would also help if you have a concrete proposal that can be
discussed. Aspirations as to mandatory build-ability (on every
platform?) are inspiring of course, but hard to action. It would also be
good to spend some time thinking through both benefits, and critically
the costs of whatever you propose, to present there.

        Any hard data: analysis of reported build failures on the list, and
their isolated causes (where they can be identified), etc. would also be
extremely useful so we have some real data to discuss.

        Thanks,

                Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.