Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Kohei,

On Mon, 23 May 2011 10:08:38 -0400
Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida@novell.com> wrote:

Because that's what we decided to do during our TSC meeting IIRC.  The
premise was that we would do merge regularly into master, ~at least
once per week as we did during the 3.3 release.  But for some reason
we haven't merged stuff into master for months for the 3.4 release,
which was not expected.  I even did merge of the calc repo alone
because of the huge delay.

Well, my understanding was that the merge from release to master is
just a safety measure to make sure we are not missing something. It
should be a NoOp most of the time. Maybe I got that wrong. Work
should still be done on the most unstable branch IMHO and tickle down to
the more stable ones (under reviews, which might be suspended in the
beginning). Keep in mind this not only about dev-time (as in this case),
but also people are filing bugs against master, verifying them etc.

Best,

Bjoern

-- 
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.