Hi Tor,
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:43:52AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
What I would like to know is if there's still a reason to use this suffix in 2011.
Only backward compatibility of binary extensions, I think? But how many of the OOo/LO shared
libraries do (binary) extensions link to anyway?
And how do they do it ?
I've downloaded an extension from http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/
and the included binaries are ELF objects but they do not need libraries with
special platform suffixes.
[objdump -x extract]
Dynamic Section:
NEEDED libcrypt.so.1
NEEDED libnsl.so.1
NEEDED libuno_cppu.so.3
NEEDED libuno_sal.so.3
NEEDED libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3
NEEDED libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
NEEDED libstlport_gcc.so
NEEDED libstdc++.so.6
NEEDED libm.so.6
NEEDED libgcc_s.so.1
NEEDED libc.so.6
--
Francois Tigeot
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness (continued)
Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness · Tor Lillqvist
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.