Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Tor,

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:43:52AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
What I would like to know is if there's still a reason to use this suffix in 2011.

Only backward compatibility of binary extensions, I think? But how many of the OOo/LO shared 
libraries do (binary) extensions link to anyway?

And how do they do it ?
I've downloaded an extension from http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/
and the included binaries are ELF objects but they do not need libraries with
special platform suffixes.

[objdump -x extract]
Dynamic Section:
  NEEDED               libcrypt.so.1
  NEEDED               libnsl.so.1
  NEEDED               libuno_cppu.so.3
  NEEDED               libuno_sal.so.3
  NEEDED               libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3
  NEEDED               libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
  NEEDED               libstlport_gcc.so
  NEEDED               libstdc++.so.6
  NEEDED               libm.so.6
  NEEDED               libgcc_s.so.1
  NEEDED               libc.so.6

-- 
Francois Tigeot

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.