On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 18:56 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:26:30AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Different DLLPOSTFIX files suggest that at some stage or other it was
desirable to be able to have the .sos from different architecture
side-by-side in the same dir. Maybe from an era before the separate arch
dirs in the solver dir, dunno.
I vaguely remember someone mentionning a giant file server in Hamburg where
all binaries where stashed together ...
As an aside, binary extensions can have multiple architectures in them,
but I don't think the per-arch suffixes we use for the internal libFoos
are propagated into the sdk for this purpose, a different arch
identifier is used IIRC.
C.
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness (continued)
(message not available)
Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness · Caolán McNamara
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.