On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 20:31 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
<sigh> I am sorry it seems I am reverting your revert ( I didn't see
your mail at all, only saw it now from searching the archives because I
didn't see my own mail due some mail client problems :-( ) I committed
this today ( hopefully with the virtually function related functions
hunks removed ) at least I didn't get any errors.
My revert was back in March, I only remembered to mention today that the
new compiler warnings would catch this. If the smoketest passes then the
changes are good because the smoketest (being in basic) catches the
error. You *did* run the smoketest didn't you. I'm sure you did.
C.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.