Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi *,

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 05:28 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Any idea what went wrong?

master is in general buildable on Windows about once a week if you are
lucky.

I still think that we should hack something up to get the buildbots to
tag a successful build, or something of that nature, and allow that to
be checked out for the casual hacker.

If the repository wasn't split into seperate repos, this would be very
trivial, tinderbox slaves would just add TinderboxPrint:
<checkout-ID>, and then the build-status boxes would contain that
info. So you'd go to tinderbox results page, look for the last green
box, and use the ID that was built.

Having multiple repos makes stuff complicated here. What might be used
instead is a timestamp, but that's not necessarily reliable - what do
you use as timestamp, when you start the pull, or when it is finished?
In between the first repo could have changed already...

It's of course possible to print the IDs of each and every repo in
that info, but that again is anything but comfortable to use...

ciao
Christian

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.