On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:10:55 +0100
Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> wrote:
I sort of imagined a rolling tag, last-known-buildable-platform or
something of that nature.
I see the point, but as git does not version tags (right?) moving the
tags would make us loose valuable information. Imaging you want to hunt
down a regression and want to do a month old build it see if it was
there already -- on Windows. Being unlucky and trying 10-30 source
states before getting one to build would not be fun. So IMHO, we should
save that information somewhere -- tags in to repo would be
natural, but that would be spamming. Maybe a textfile somewhere?
Best,
Bjoern
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.