On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:36:03AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I checked manually if the number was in the file. I didn't check
further, as I don't know a way to do that.
OK. I don't know of any clever direct way either, but using
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/more/libs-core/svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc?full=RID_SVX_START++296
and
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/more/libs-core/svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc?full=RID_SVX_START++289 I
found that the RID_SVX_START+296 and RID_SVX_START+289 values apparently already *are* taken. See
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/libs-core/svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc#108 and
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/libs-core/svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc#188 . Whether this overlap
with your added RID_* values is a problem or not, I have no idea, sorry.
I hope some of our more clueful list members can enlighten us...
AFAIK this does not matter if the resources come from different resource
files. E.g., if one uses CUI_RES(RID_FROBNICATE) in cui and
SVX_RES(RID_KABOOZLE) in svx, different resources are returned even if
RID_FROBNICATE and RID_KABOOZLE happen to have the same numeric value.
(Marginal note: I have spotted at least one RID_ decl. in
svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc (RID_SVXPAGE_MEASURE) that appears to be unused
in svx and is defined in .src file in cui; the decl. should probably be
moved there too.)
D.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.