On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:10:13AM -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 07:44 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
... exists yet, it just points to a nonexistent file. LibO sees the
(symlink) file, so it doesn't allow to import a template with the same
name, but it cannot open it as a template, so it doesn't list it in the
dialog. Elementary, my dear Watson.
Yes well it wasn't my meaning to complain on that, that part's quite
logic.
What I wondered was if it would be a Good Idea or a Bad Idea to be able
to just import a template overwriting an existing one with the same
name, instead of having to do the double operation of 1) deleting the
old template 2) importing the new template?
IMHO it is a Good Idea.
D.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.